Many districts in California use Student Information Systems (SIS) such as Aeries to store key data on enrollment, attendance, and student records. When after-school platforms need the same data, a thoughtful integration with additional software can reduce repeated tasks, improve accuracy, and help with compliance reporting for CA ELO-P, ASES, and 21st CCLC. This chapter covers the technical and practical steps for IT directors, network administrators, and data managers who want to link an SIS to an after-school management platform. In the sections ahead, you’ll find actionable tips, references, and strategies for shaping a stable solution that supports your district in the long run. It also addresses real-world roadblocks you may face after launch, helping you avoid common pitfalls that hinder progress.
Why Integration Matters for California After-School Programs
Many districts work under CA ELO-P (Expanded Learning Opportunities Program), ASES (After School Education and Safety), or 21st CCLC (21st Century Community Learning Centers). These grants often require detailed attendance and demographic data. Manual processes can be frustrating and prone to errors. By connecting a system like Aeries to your after-school software, you can more easily maintain up-to-date information for compliance. This allows Aeries to remain the single source of truth, while keeping student records consistent, whether they’re in class during the day or participating in extended learning later.
Key benefits:
• Consistency of Student Records: If enrollment or contact details change in Aeries, the after-school software can pull those updates in real time.
• Accurate Attendance Tracking: Data from after-school attendance can be formatted for simple compliance reporting.
• Reduced Administrative Burden: Staff can avoid doing the same data entry multiple times, freeing them to focus on direct services for students.
• Regulatory Compliance: Automating data transfers lowers the risk of human error and also helps protect confidentiality.
Important Initial Considerations
Data Compatibility and Interoperability
Before connecting these systems, make sure the data formats can align. Many modern SIS products, including Aeries, offer APIs and custom integrations with software providers. Many also support standards like OneRoster. Look for an after-school platform with a history of integrating with your SIS. If your chosen vendor can’t meet these standards, custom solutions might be required, which often become costly.
Practical tips:
• Ask vendors if they integrate with your specific SIS.
• Check if they allow secure file transfers for batch data if real-time syncing is not available.
• See how they manage and define the single source of truth for all data.
Scalability as Enrollment and Programs Grow
After-school programs might start small but expand to multiple campuses later. If your district plans to grow—perhaps more schools will run ASES or ELO-P—ensure the integration can handle larger workloads. Systems should process high volumes of data without slowing down or timing out.
Recommended actions:
• Seek solutions that let you update only new or changed data, rather than reloading all records daily.
• Ask about API rate limits and if they could disrupt daily tasks.
• Keep data standards consistent across schools to avoid confusion if a campus uses different SIS configurations.
Usability for All Stakeholders
A strong integration won’t help if staff find it too difficult to use. Check that both the interface and technical setup are user-friendly. Accessibility also matters, so people with disabilities can do their tasks without barriers.
Questions to ask:
• “Can the platform run on tablets or other devices for attendance?”
• “Is there a built-in Single Sign-On with district accounts?”
• “Are there clear dashboards for site coordinators and district leaders?”
Gaining Buy-In from Administrators, Teachers, and Coordinators
Data in these systems is relevant to many groups: district administrators, site coordinators, teachers overseeing programs, and IT teams. Involve them early to avoid unexpected objections. Their feedback helps you prioritize features that matter most.
Engagement tactics:
• Form a small working group to test the integration on a pilot basis.
• Talk with staff to learn about their biggest daily headaches.
• Show how automation can simplify their normal routines.
Costs and Resource Assessment
Integration can bring licensing fees, infrastructure updates, or extra work for support staff. Identify these costs upfront. Surprises can derail or stop a project that would otherwise help everyone.
Budget-related questions:
• “Does the vendor charge extra for syncing or support?”
• “Are we prepared to pay for custom development if either system changes?”
• “Do we have funding for training or professional development?”
Privacy, Security, and Reliability Requirements
Districts handle sensitive student data, so you must follow rules such as FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) and COPPA (Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act). California has additional laws like SOPIPA and Education Code 49073.1.
Compliance with Federal and State Laws
FERPA states that student information must only be shared for educational purposes. When sharing data with an after-school vendor, the district typically names them as a “school official” with a valid educational need. COPPA covers online services for children under 13, which is often relevant in after-school settings.
Action steps:
• Check that the vendor follows FERPA and COPPA and has signed the Student Privacy Pledge.
• Look at California laws like AB-1584 (revising Ed Code 49073.1).
• Require a written guarantee that student data will not be sold or used beyond its educational purpose.
Data Security Measures
Student information needs protection at rest and in transit. Encryption, firewalls, intrusion detection, and role-based access are standard safeguards.
Key questions:
• “Are data transfers encrypted with HTTPS?”
• “Does the system use secure authentication methods (e.g., multi-factor or SSO)?”
• “How does the vendor notify us if there’s a data breach?”
If the vendor manages large amounts of sensitive data, check if they hold certifications like SOC 2 or ISO 27001.
Reliability and Uptime
Attendance tracking often happens at specific times of day. If the SIS or after-school platform goes offline during that key window, recordkeeping will be disrupted. Service-level agreements (SLAs) should describe expected uptime.
Tips:
• Look for providers that promise at least 99.9% availability.
• Ask if there’s a backup or quick failover process.
• Have a plan for limited connectivity: can staff mark attendance offline and sync later?
Data Governance and Contractual Protections
Contracts should define who is responsible for data management, storage, and breach response. California requires that districts keep ownership of student records. This approach also offers legal recourse if a vendor violates its security or privacy pledges.
Elements to include in your data-sharing agreement:
• Which uses of the data are permitted and which are forbidden
• How and when data is removed
• A clear plan for handling breaches or security incidents
Common Integration Challenges and Practical Solutions
Even with solid planning, issues can arise when linking Aeries to an after-school platform. Here are typical problems and ways to fix them.
Maintaining Data Accuracy
Inconsistencies break trust and cause headaches if one system’s student details don’t match the other. Automated syncing is less error-prone than manual entry. The SIS becomes the primary source, with the after-school tool continuously updated.
Best practices:
• Standardize how names, birthdates, and other fields are entered.
• Use an event-based API to send changes as they happen.
• Schedule routine checks to find any mismatches.
• Decide ahead which system’s data “wins” if there’s a conflict.
Attendance Reporting
After-school teams often log attendance in their own system, but admins need combined reports for grants or internal tracking. An automated feed or report from the after-school tool to the SIS can solve this.
Implementation suggestions:
• Set up a daily sync time that fits reporting cycles.
• If real-time updates are needed, ensure the vendor can handle quick spikes when many students check in at once.
• Have a fallback if the internet goes down, so staff can record attendance on paper and upload it later.
Reducing Staff Workload
One main goal is to cut double data entry. When a new student enrolls in Aeries, that info should pass straight to the after-school platform.
Ways to lighten the load:
• Use automated rostering so SIS enrollment data updates rosters automatically.
• Combine compliance reports rather than having staff match them across multiple systems.
• Employ single sign-on so site staff only keep one set of credentials.
Proactive planning often leads to fewer errors and a significant drop in busywork. Then staff can focus on students instead of forms.
Step-by-Step Roadmap: Pilot Through Rollout and Maintenance
Setting up a fresh after-school integration involves planning, training, and a commitment to keep things running well. The steps below outline a path forward.
Plan and Prepare
Define objectives:
• Name clear goals like “Cut after-school data entry by 50%” or “Push integrated attendance by 6 PM daily.”
• Decide which fields (demographics, enrollment, contact info) must be shared.
Stakeholder input:
• Bring in district admins, after-school leads, and IT staff to share concerns.
• Collect frustrations, such as mismatched rosters or too many logins.
Technical checklist:
• Confirm your SIS version and see if there’s vendor documentation for integrations.
• Clean existing data to remove duplicates or incomplete records.
Resource allocations:
• Budget for possible extra fees or add-on modules.
• Set aside staff time for setup, testing, and later support.
Pilot on a Small Scale
Start with one or two schools to test the integration in a simpler environment. Pick a site with enthusiastic staff or a straightforward after-school format.
Pilot guidelines:
• Provide thorough training so the pilot team knows each step.
• Ask them to log daily issues and feedback.
• Watch for data sync timing, system performance, and user interface clarity.
• Offer direct IT support during the pilot so problems can be fixed fast.
Pilots might last several weeks or a full session. This stage uncovers flaws before rolling out more broadly.
Evaluate and Refine
After the pilot, look at the results. Were there data mismatches? Did staff see real time savings? Survey users:
• Time savings: Check how many hours of data entry you avoided.
• Data accuracy: Look for fewer SIS vs. after-school discrepancies.
• User satisfaction: Ask coordinators if things run more smoothly now.
Fix any bugs or adjust settings. If you missed fields (like emergency contacts), add them now. Dealing with these issues here makes the district-wide rollout much easier.
Expand Rollout Across the District
A gradual rollout is less risky than switching all schools at once. You might go site by site or by certain clusters.
Steps for broader deployment:
• Share a timeline so each campus knows when they’ll start.
• Offer training or webinars where your “pilot champions” explain how they benefited.
• Prepare IT support for a spike in help tickets in the first week at each new location.
• Gather feedback from each site and refine the approach for the next wave.
This phased method allows small adjustments between groups while minimizing disruptions.
Training and Sustained Change Management
Districts that invest in clear, ongoing training see better results. Tailor sessions by role (such as site coordinator vs. data clerk).
Strategies:
• Train-the-trainer approach: Let pilot staff lead training at each campus.
• Step-by-step materials: Provide documents or video guides on tasks like taking attendance or creating reports.
• Strong support channels: Use a designated help desk or ticket system for integration-related questions.
When administrators highlight benefits—like fewer repetitive tasks or only one login—staff are more likely to stay on board.
Ongoing Maintenance and Improvement
Integration isn’t something you set up and forget. Both the SIS and the after-school platform will change over time, so you need to watch the connection.
Maintenance tasks:
• Review sync logs daily or weekly for errors.
• Perform regular audits to confirm data remains consistent.
• Monitor vendor updates for new features or possible changes to their API.
• Keep training resources updated. New hires will need instructions on how to use the system.
Regular check-ins with after-school coordinators can catch small problems before they grow.
Moving Forward With Confidence
IT directors, network administrators, and data managers lead the charge when linking Aeries with an after-school system. Careful attention to compatibility, privacy, security, and scalability can connect school-day and extended-day data into a cohesive environment. By following the steps of planning, piloting, refining, phased rollout, training, and ongoing maintenance, your district can set up a system that adapts to new enrollments, changing program demands, and evolving technology.
When done with care, you’ll see:
• Less repetitive work
• Fewer data errors
• Better and faster reporting for grants like ASES and 21st CCLC
• Higher confidence among administrators and site staff
A well-tuned SIS and after-school platform integration can deliver daily peace of mind. Instead of juggling spreadsheets, your team can rely on accurate, real-time data. This eases burdens across the board—from the finance office handling program funds to the after-school teacher marking attendance with just a few clicks.
Chapter Summary
Chapter 15 delivers a technical roadmap for connecting your district’s SIS (like Aeries) with afterschool platforms to eliminate redundant data entry and reporting headaches. The integration process begins with assessing compatibility through APIs or standards like OneRoster, followed by addressing critical security requirements under FERPA, COPPA, and California-specific laws (SOPIPA, Ed Code 49073.1). The chapter details practical solutions to common challenges: maintaining data accuracy by establishing a “single source of truth,” automating attendance reporting for grant compliance, and implementing role-based access controls. A proven four-phase implementation approach (plan-pilot-evaluate-expand) minimizes disruption while maximizing adoption. Technical specifications include encryption requirements, recommended uptime guarantees (99.9%+), and failover procedures for offline attendance tracking. When properly implemented, this integration can cut administrative workload by 50% while ensuring accurate, real-time data flows between school-day and extended-day programs.
Key Takeaways
• Integrating SIS with afterschool platforms can eliminate redundant data entry, reduce errors, and streamline compliance reporting for California grant programs like ELO-P, ASES, and 21st CCLC.
• Data privacy and security are non-negotiable requirements—ensure vendors comply with FERPA, COPPA, and California-specific laws like SOPIPA and Education Code 49073.1.
• A phased implementation approach (planning, piloting, evaluation, rollout) minimizes disruption and allows for adjustments before district-wide deployment.
• Stakeholder engagement from the beginning increases buy-in and helps prioritize features that address real pain points for administrators and site staff.
• Ongoing maintenance and regular audits are essential to ensure data consistency as both systems evolve over time.
• Well-executed integration results in measurable benefits: reduced administrative workload, fewer data errors, faster grant reporting, and increased staff confidence.
Action Checklist
NOTE: This entire chapter is, in some ways, a checklist for thinking through each part of the integrating an afterschool platform with your SIS. However, below we offer the key phases you’ll want to be aware of and plan for.
Phase 1: Planning & Preparation
- Define clear integration objectives (e.g., “Reduce data entry by 50%” or “Enable daily attendance syncing by 6 PM”)
- Assemble a cross-functional working group (IT, administrators, afterschool leads) to document requirements
- Verify your SIS version’s API capabilities and available integration documentation
Phase 2: Technical & Compliance Setup
- Create a data field mapping document identifying exactly which student information will be shared
- Draft a data governance agreement covering ownership, permitted uses, and security requirements
- Confirm vendor compliance with FERPA, COPPA, and California-specific privacy laws
Phase 3: Pilot Implementation
- Select 1-2 school sites with enthusiastic staff for initial testing
- Develop a structured feedback process to document issues and benefits
- Provide direct IT support during the pilot phase to quickly address problems
Phase 4: Evaluation & Refinement
- Measure time savings, data accuracy improvements, and user satisfaction
- Address any data synchronization issues or missing fields before wider deployment
Phase 5: District-Wide Rollout
- Create a phased deployment schedule for remaining school sites
- Develop role-specific training materials (site coordinators, data clerks, administrators)
- Prepare IT support for increased help desk tickets during initial deployment
Phase 6: Ongoing Maintenance
- Implement a monitoring system to regularly audit data synchronization
- Schedule periodic reviews of vendor updates that might affect the integration
- Maintain updated training resources for new staff